Research

Why the need is clear

The evidence points to a simple problem: athletes often need support, but trust, specialization, and continuity decide whether they actually use it. The model is built around those conditions rather than treating them as secondary.

Find care How it works

Help-seeking is low
Trust affects disclosure
Support quality matters

Research highlights

Care-seeking, trust, and fit are the recurring pattern.

72% of athletes experiencing mental health issues never seek help at all.
54% would avoid support because of teammate perception.
40 studies / 14,462 athletes social support linked to stronger well-being outcomes.

Care-seeking gap

Many athletes need support before they ever enter care.

The signal is not just that need exists. It is that awareness alone does not move people through the barrier when trust and fit are still uncertain.

72%

Never seek help

Of athletes experiencing mental health issues, many never make it to professional support.

54%

Teammate perception

Visible support can still feel risky when athletes worry about how others may read it.

5-10%

Small help-seeking share

Only a small slice of athletes with mental health conditions seek professional help.

26%

Readiness still varies

Even adjacent support roles may not feel equipped to address mental health directly.

Trust and confidentiality

Privacy shapes whether athletes are willing to begin.

When support feels too visible or too close to the team, disclosure can become the hardest part of care. The model needs to lower that cost from the start.

Disclosure feels costly

Athletes can hesitate when support seems easy to trace back to team life
Confidentiality concerns can matter before any session is booked
The first step needs to feel private enough to take

Trust is part of access

Availability alone does not solve reluctance
Support has to feel safe before it feels useful
The match itself is part of the trust decision

Support pathways matter

Independent pathways reduce the feeling of organizational pressure
Privacy can be designed into the introduction, not added later
Fit improves willingness to stay with care

Specialization and provider-readiness

General care is useful, but sport context changes the work.

Athletes do better when providers are ready for performance pressure, injury, identity, transition, and the rhythm of sport life before the first introduction.

Sport context is specific

Performance stress, injury recovery, and identity shifts are part of the care path.

Provider readiness is uneven

Licensure alone does not guarantee familiarity with athlete needs or language.

Quality changes the match

The introduction works better when the provider is prepared before the athlete arrives.

Fit beats convenience

Open appointments help, but they do not replace a provider who understands the context.

Continuity and support

Care works better when athletes can stay with it.

The research points beyond first contact. It suggests that support quality and continuity shape whether care becomes meaningful instead of just available.

Research signal

40 studies, 14,462 athletes

Across the literature reviewed in the project materials, social support was linked to stronger well-being and lower anxiety, depression, and stress.

Practical implication

Continuity is part of the product.

Athletes are more likely to stay with care when the match feels useful enough to build trust over time, not just start the conversation.

Model link

The research points back to the matching model.

Trust, context, and continuity are the actual product thesis. See how they shape the athlete experience in the matching flow.

How it works Find care